FCA calls on second charge mortgage firms to raise standards for consumers
The regulator said brokers in the wider mortgage market should improve record keeping and quality assurance where possible.
Second charge mortgage firms have been told to improve standards for consumers after a review by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) found problems with how some companies give advice, check affordability, and charge fees.
Research found some lenders and brokers did not always factor in key living costs when assessing if customers could afford repayments.
There were cases where people were steered towards debt consolidation, even when it was not clear if it was the right choice.
Record keeping was also found to be lacking in some instances, with fees that were not always clear and often added to loans, making it difficult for customers to compare options.
David Geale, executive director of payments and digital finance at the FCA, said: “The second charge market is relied on by people often already heavily in debt.
“It’s vital it works well, but we’ve found that standards are not always where they need to be. This needs to change.”
The FCA called on all second charge mortgage firms to look at the findings and take action.
The regulator also said brokers in the wider mortgage market should improve record keeping and quality assurance where possible.
The FCA stated that it would keep working with firms to raise standards and monitor the market, taking action where needed.
The regulator will also look at possible mortgage policy changes to ensure good outcomes for people consolidating debt.
REACTION:
James Daley, managing director of consumer group Fairer Finance:
“It’s encouraging to see the FCA shining the spotlight on a sector which often deals with financially vulnerable customers.
“It’s clear that many firms are not living up to the high standards set by the Consumer Duty, and it’s vital that the FCA’s work in this sector does not end with today’s announcement.
“It’s nearly three years since the Consumer Duty came into force – and where it identifies poor conduct, it’s vital that the regulator makes use of its enforcement powers.
“Over the past year, we’ve seen the regulator talking much more about deregulation than consumer protection, and it runs the risk that firms will perceive this message to mean that the pressure is off.
“There are still many areas of financial services where firms are falling well short of the Consumer Duty – and the FCA needs to show that there are consequences for bad practice.”
Damien Burke, head of regulatory practice at Broadstone:
“Second charge mortgages have been traditionally used to provide a practical option for borrowers who need to manage existing debt without refinancing their primary mortgage, particularly in a higher interest rate environment where remortgaging may not be viable.
“The market has changed somewhat in recent years with borrowers just as likely to be financing home improvements or paying for school fees.
“However, as the FCA’s findings highlight, these products are still used by customers with limited financial resilience.
“Whatever the need, robust affordability assessments are essential to understanding individual’s affordability and a growing number of firms and individuals are turning to Open Banking and Open Finance data to fulfil that need, with an FCA Research Note released in March 2025 stating there are 13.3 million active Open Banking users in the UK. Not all lenders or brokers offer that capability though.
“The issues identified around affordability checks, debt consolidation advice and fee transparency go to the heart of the Consumer Duty and you cannot provide good advice unless you first understand the individual’s circumstances.
“Firms must be able to clearly demonstrate that the recommendations they make genuinely deliver good outcomes for customers, rather than simply increasing borrowing or extending debt burdens.
“This review should act as a prompt for lenders and brokers across the wider mortgage market to revisit their processes, affordability assessments, documentation and oversight.
“Ensuring that customers fully understand the benefits, costs, risks and alternatives to second charge borrowing will be essential if the market is to maintain trust while continuing to provide an important source of credit for households seeking alternative finance options.”










